<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Articles><Article><id>187</id><JournalTitle>A COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING AND NON-MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN E-MAIL FILTERING</JournalTitle><Abstract>The increasing volume of unsolicited bulk e-mail (spam) has generated a need for reliable anti-spam filters. Filters
of this type have so far been based mostly on keyword patterns that are constructed by hand and perform poorly. In this paper
an investigation is done on the performance of two approaches in the context of anti-spam filtering. The first approach uses a
non-machine learning filter using black listed addresses taken from domain name system and a public spam and ham words
taken from websites. The second approach uses a supervised machine learning approach based on NaÃ¯ve Bayesian algorithm.
The Naive Bayesian classifier has recently been suggested as an effective method to construct automatically anti-spam filters
with superior performance. We investigate thoroughly the performance of the two filterson personal user E mails, and then a
comparison is done on the performance of the Naive Bayesian filter to the other approach. As a result the NaÃ¯ve Bayesian
approach achieved accurate spam filtering, outperforming clearly the keyword-based filter of a widely used e-mail reader</Abstract><Email>nadiaf_1966@yahoo.com</Email><articletype>Review</articletype><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><year>2015</year><keyword>Email, anti-spam,NaÃ¯ve Bayesian Filter</keyword><AUTHORS>Nadia Al-Bakri</AUTHORS><afflication>Assistance Lecturer in Computer Science Dept., AL Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.</afflication></Article></Articles>