<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Articles><Article><id>558</id><JournalTitle>DECISION MAKING REGARDING ROUTE OF HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN UTERINE CONDITIONS</JournalTitle><Abstract>The study was a randomized prospective comparative study of abdominal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and
laparoscopic hysterectomy with benign uterine conditions. A total of 200 cases were admitted to Gynecology ward
requiring hysterectomy for enlarged uterus due to benign diseases were enrolled in this study. These 200 cases were
randomly allocated into three groups using randomization procedure according to the type of surgery. Out of these 200
cases, 100 cases were subjected for total abdominal hysterectomy, 76 for vaginal hysterectomy and 24 laparoscopic
hysterectomy. The feasibility of vaginal hysterectomy in moderately enlarged uterus was studied along with intra-operative
complications, post-operative morbidity, post-operative hospital stay and recovery. Blood loss ,operating time, hospital
stay, returning to work , post operative morbidity, fever, UTI, wound gape, wound infection were more in abdominal
hysterectomy. There was no significant difference in peri-operative complications between Non Descended Vaginal
Hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy group. It is concluded that patient requiring hysterectomy for non prolapsed
cases, the option of vaginal route is less invasive with minimal or no complication and more economic and effective.</Abstract><Email>fasiha.aziz@yahoo.com</Email><articletype>Research</articletype><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><year>2017</year><keyword>hysterectomy,benign uterine conditions,NDVH</keyword><AUTHORS>Fasiha Tasneem,Shyam Sirsam</AUTHORS><afflication>Associate professor, Department of OBGY, Dr. S C Govt Medical College, Vishnupuri, Nanded, Maharashtra, India., Associate professor, Department of OBGY, Govt Medical College, Akola, Maharashtra, India.</afflication></Article></Articles>