<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Articles><Article><id>762</id><JournalTitle>QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF MEDIAL PARAPATELLAR CAPSULE SHRINKAGE FOR RECURRENT PATELLAR DISLOCATION: COMPARING THERMAL MODIFICATION AND OPEN SURGERY EFFECTS ON PATELLAR LATERAL DISPLACEMENT AND STIFFNESS</JournalTitle><Abstract>The efficacy of thermal shrinkage in treating recurrent patellar dislocations remains controversial, primarily due to the
qualitative assessment of its effectiveness. To address this issue, a quantitative study was conducted to evaluate the
effectiveness of medial parapatellar capsule shrinkage in reducing inflammation. Data on lateral displacement were
collected from nine cadaveric knees, comparing shrinkage before and after open surgery or medial shrinkage. A physician
applied medial pressure on the patella to simulate clinical examination while measuring force and displacement.
Additionally, 10 healthy subjects were tasked with laterally moving the patella under medial force to assess the feasibility of
the technique. Four types of data (normal knees, knees subjected to thermal shrinkage, knees subjected to open surgery, and
knees from cadavers) were compared based on applied force, resulting displacement, and force-displacement ratio. Results
indicated that cadaveric knee displacements and applied forces were significantly higher than those of normal subjects after
thermal modification. However, no significant differences were observed before and after thermal modification. Open
surgery led to significant reductions in displacement but increased applied forces. Despite thermal shrinkage, no immediate
differences were observed in shrunk parapatellar capsules. Immediate improvement in stiffness was observed in the knee
capsule post-open surgery on the stiff side</Abstract><Email>Sudheer@gmail.com</Email><articletype>Research</articletype><volume>5</volume><issue>12</issue><year>2015</year><keyword>The efficacy of thermal shrinkage in treating recurrent patellar dislocations remains controversial, primarily due to the qualitative assessment of its effectiveness. To address this issue, a quantitative study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness </keyword><AUTHORS>Sudheer Kumar Reddy</AUTHORS><afflication>Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Sree Balaji Medical College & Hospital, Chennai - 600044.</afflication></Article></Articles>